Restorative Justice and Restitution Essay

invigorating Justice and damagesIntroduction honourables and values be considered to be the same to studyity of the slew in the cabaret. Values or ethics, merely is considered to be the standards that are set in spite of appearance a hunting lodge and portrays how the views of an opposite(prenominal) commonwealth can be considered to be amend or wrong, either at the workplace, in the social circles or scour nationally (Van Ness, & Strong, 2013). Morals on the other hired man are considered to be independent to both mortal since they originate from matters of belief, choices and faith. Morals lot with the making of either right or wrong, fair or unfair decisions, unprejudiced or dishonest choices that ca-ca a direct squeeze on the religion or belief of an individual (Zehr, 2002). The theories of faith that play a role in this case allow in the theory of utilitariansm, whereby it is considered to be righteously good for the majority (Zehr, Mika, & Umbreit, 1 997). The other theory is the theory of moral courage, which is considered to be to be the main pillar of ethics. Moral courage requires that one makes steadfast allegiance to principles that are honorable and fundamental scorn facing frees such as potential risks, shame, loss of reputation, isolation, emotional anxiety, retaliation and even loss of employment (Umbreit, 1989). Tough and morally right decisions have to be make despite the consequences. The concept of revitalising evaluator and restitution is an approach that is mainly centre on the various needs that victims of aversion and the offenders have as well as the community within which passel stretch forth in (Zehr, 2002). The aim and purpose of keynote respectableice and restitution is not just to fill the principles of the legal bring or punishment to the offender but to satisfy the needs of the offenders as well as that of the victims (Van Ness, & Strong, 2013). The revitalising arbiter and restitution is base on the theory of arbitrator. This theory patently considers wrongdoing and offensive activity as an villainy that is committed against a community and an individual and not the evoke (Zehr, 2002). The legal process, as much as its purpose is to work arbitrator where it is due, does not aim at increasing animosity and hatred in the society and hence the reason for soda pop justice and restitution. It is important for people to spirited in harmony and get on (Zehr, Mika, & Umbreit, 1997). The process that is touch on in soda justice does not aim at benefiting the offender but to bring people together, the victims as well as the offenders and set about peace and harmony in the society. anyone in the society should be ready to pro abundant a process that encourages harmony and nit set up hatred and animosity hence quinine water justice and restitution plays a major role in building a better society for the future (Umbreit, 1989). The ethical issues that are r elated to the concept of restorative justice and restitution include the issue of for given upess between the people that have been affected by the actions of the offender (Zehr, 2002). other ethical issue that is involved with visualise to restorative justice and restitution is that a crime is not committed against the state but rather against the victims and the society (Van Ness, & Strong, 2013). The needs in addition to the issues that the victims have as well as the offenders need to be considered to promote harmony in the society. The other ethical issue to be considered downstairs restorative justice is whether offenders should be given a second chance in the society and allowed to make things right with the victims of their offenses (Umbreit, 1989). Restorative justice too has its implications in the long run. The implications of restorative justice and restitution include increased accountability in the society restoration and improvement of relationships in the society hence reduce chances of future offenses in terms of retaliations and penalize (Zehr, 2002). Furthermore, restorative justice has the implication of restoring trust and admirering in the growth of long term relationships in the community and between the people involved in the whole process (Umbreit, 1989). long safety and building of confidence is also another implication of restorative justice that forget be achieved. The approach that entrust be suitable in reach the decision on whether to meet the coned massacre would be through with(predicate) counselling sessions for the family phalluss and through seeking of information from people or families that have had an experience with restorative justice (Van Ness, & Strong, 2013). The needs and concerns of each family member give need to be addressed and mold out their views about the see and what they would motivation done differently. Counselling sessions for the family members will help build their confidence and gradu ally adoption of the loss of the loved one (Zehr, 2002). subsequently the counselling sessions, regular shocks should be conducted with the family members to con be given on whether to allow for the concussion or to refuse the meeting. The steps to undertake in approaching the decision making process will involve calling for a family meeting whereby all members should be present. Every family member is to be given a chance to air their views and their opinions based on the theory of moral courage and virtues (Umbreit, 1989). after(prenominal) the family meeting, it would be important to contact the member of the Victims Group and discuss the conditions under which the meeting would be held if it will take place and establish the nett motive why the convict wants the meeting (Zehr, Mika, & Umbreit, 1997). After that, have another family meeting and analyze the findings based on moral values and in the spirit of restorative justice (Zehr, 2002). This will lead to a decision of meeting the convict since the benefits of the meeting outweigh lack of the meeting. The possible questions would alone be two main questions and that includesWhat scarce led the convict to commit the crime and did the victim deserve to die in such a manner?What would the convict have done if his situation was transposed? Restorative justice and restitution is serious in the society and helps in avoiding proceed criminality within a society. However, it should not be over exercised since criminals may tend to take advantage of the same to happen committing heinous crimes. The full force of the police force should also play a major role in curbing crimes in the society.ReferencesUmbreit, M. S. (1989). Crime victims seeking fairness, not revenge Toward restorative justice. Fed. Probation, 53, 52.Umbreit, M. S., Coates, R. B., & Kalanj, B. (1994). Victim meets offender The impact of restorative justice and mediation (pp. 53-64). Monsey, NY sad Justice Press.Van Ness, D. W., & S trong, K. H. (2013). Restoring justice An entering to restorative justice. Newnes.Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA Good books.Zehr, H., Mika, H., & Umbreit, M. (1997). Restorative justice The concept. Corrections Today, 59, 68-71.Source document