Essay about Utilitarianism and Its Shortcomings - 1273 Words

Utilitarianism is the argument that all actions must be made for the greatest happiness for the greater number of people (Bentham, 42). However, utilitarianism cannot always be the basis of one’s decisions due to the fact that people need to look out for their own pain and pleasure before consulting others’ wellbeing. I will first explain the arguments of the utilitarianism ideal. Then I willl explain why this argument is unconvincing. Ultimately, I will then prove why people consider their own happiness before considering others. Thus showing the utilitarianism view is implausible due to the need for people to consider their own happiness when making decisions or else they themselves will be experiencing the most pain and unhappiness. In†¦show more content†¦Thus Bentham believes humans consider the possible outcomes of the acts they are about to do before they do them by weighing the pleasures and pains of the act and that we should try to strive for the greatest happiness for society as a whole when choosing the acts we execute. John Stuart Mill adds more arguments to Bentham’s view of Utilitarianism, which are important factors to consider when discussing this topic. Utilitarianism is the idea to promote the greatest happiness to the general society as opposed to oneself (Mill, 114). Each pleasure is said to have its own difference in quality, so people are able to make the choice between two pleasures (115). Mill believes mental pleasures reign more important than bodily pleasures seeing that bodily pleasures are seen as inferior to the greater good (115). It takes a higher grade of pleasures to make a human satisfied and pleased. â€Å"It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied† (116). An important factor for choosing higher pleasures over inferior pleasures is that you only have time for one pleasure and if you chose the inferior pleasure it will be wasted (117). However the standards of what is right and wron g are not decided by the person’s own happiness but the happiness of everyone who is concerned in the decision (117). Being a Utilitarian forces you to stay anShow MoreRelatedUtilitarianism And The Most Important Argument1679 Words   |  7 PagesIn this essay, I will be writing about utilitarianism and the most important notion that arises from it, which is that an action is morally right only if it maximizes the greatest good for the greatest number of people (Cahn, 114). First, I will explain what utilitarianism is, when and by whom it was originally created, and a brief explanation of what it stands for. I will then explain the two different types of classical utilitarianism and explain the differences between the two. Next, I will giveRead MoreMilners Response to Too High for Humanity Essay790 Words   |  4 PagesToo High for Humanity This paper will evaluate the merits of the argument â€Å"Too high for humanity† against the validity the theory Utilitarianism. More specifically we will introduce the argument, Milner’s responses to the argument then analyze the arguments’ structure, validity and soundness. The argument â€Å"Too high for humanity† is the notion that: if being morally right only exists when people maximize pleasure to society, then it is something that humans are not capable of. To clarify, this isRead MoreEthics Vs. Kantian Ethics1249 Words   |  5 Pagesuniversal questions. Beyond answers, philosophers explored schools of thought that would best govern human decision making. Two prominent ethical theories that arose were utilitarianism and deontological ethics. Both ethical theories developed to establish and justify a set of different moral rules and principles. Utilitarianism, otherwise known as consequentialism, is an ethical theory that sees the best moral decision is one that maximizes utility, which implies that no moral decision is intrinsicallyRead MoreEthical Implications Of Business Morals1647 Words   |  7 Pagescongruity to promoting. Next, we clarify ISCT and show to some degree how ISCT might be down to earth to one of the more unyielding issu es of showcasing morals, that of pay off. At long last, we recognize suggestions for administrators and analysts. Utilitarianism is one of the best known and most powerful good hypotheses. Like different types of consequentialism, its center thought is that whether activities are ethically right or wrong relies on upon their belongings. All the more particularly, the mainRead MoreUtilitarianism And The Political And Economic Aspects Of Development1493 Words   |  6 PagesUtilitarianism in the political and economic aspects of development has been widely recognized and human social practice plays a huge impact. But the utilitarian always at the place of criticism, misunderstanding. People tend to equate utilitarianism simply with individualism. In fact, the means of utilitarianism not only consider a behaviour and motivation, and to emphasize life purpose should emerge to the scope of his own happiness, to care about other people s happiness and the improvement ofRead MorePhilosophy: Deontology vs. Utilinarianism Essay761 Words   |  4 Pagesby following universal rules or performing what is ought to do, but by respecting human beings as rational beings as well. Deontology judges the ethical motive of an action not by its consequences, merely by the reasoning behind it. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism, in the contrary, is based on the principle of utility or usefulness. Utility is what encourages an agent to act in a particular way (Tuckett, 1998). Utility can be explained as maximizing the good like pleasure and happiness and minimizingRead MoreUtilitarianism : Mill s Theory Of Utilitarianism1394 Words   |  6 PagesKonstantin Keller Anne Portman Philosophy 2010 21 October 2015 In Chapters 2 and 4 of Utilitarianism, Mill responds and attempts to refute misconceptions and arguments against utilitarianism and further broadens his examination of happiness. Along with this he also defines the subtle differences in his own theory of utilitarianism. By claiming that it is better to be â€Å"better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied†, Mill asserts that it is better to use one’s higher capacities to be awareRead MoreUse of Exaggeration in Hard Times1545 Words   |  7 PagesHard Times, in the form of caricature and farce to criticize the theory of utilitarianism; the popular way of living in the Victorian age. Utilitarianism comes under the theory of consequentialism which dictates that one should always judge an action from its consequences, and follow the course which benefits the majority. By exaggerating his characters he essentially uses them to represent varying views on utilitarianism; ie; what it implies not only as the basis of society but also at the personalRead MoreMovie Analysis : Film 1250 Words   |  5 Pageswhile Dino escaped the original punishment. †¨ According to the critics of Utilitarianism, this argument illustrates one of the theory s most serious shortcomings, namely, that it is incompatible with the ideal of justice. Justice requires that we treat people fairly, according to the merits of their particular situations. In McCloskey s example, Utilitarianism requires that we treat someone unfairly. Thus, Utilitarianism cannot be right. (217)†¨Morals indicate that you are someone who works withinRead MoreUtilitarianism : The Ethical Theory1848 Words   |  8 Pages Utilitarianism came about through the consequentialist ethical theory, which states that consequences determines whether something is good or bad. It is the idea that humans should act in a way that promotes the best utility for the most people. Utility can vary depending on the culture, but for the most part it means the greatest happiness or good for the most amount of people versus unhappiness. In order to determine what the best utility is, one must first determine what is intrinsically good

Attention Getter How Many Of You Guys Have Heard Of...

Attention ATTENTION GETTER: How many of you guys have heard of Edward Snowden? PURPOSE (state specific purpose, relate topic to audience and establish credibility): In the world of today most records can be easily accessed by a home computer. Some believe this has benefits, while others are screaming about invasion of privacy STATE THESIS (Should/ Should not): The Internet has revolutionized the world by innovating the way we access our information, but our private information is been invaded and share without our consent. MAIN POINTS: †¢ As Americans citizens privacy is a fundamental Human Right and its concerning when our rights are violated. †¢ Government monitoring us and gathering information to â€Å"Protect us† †¢ Companies manipulation of personal information for their own benefits Body (USE ONLY COMPLETE SENTENCES) I. Need (state as a single declarative sentence): The government should find a balance between corporations and consumers because constitutional rights are violated. A) SUBPOINT: The right to privacy is being invaded and citizens are demanding answers. 1. The 14th Amendment of the constitution state that our privacy can’t be access without a warrant. 2. Also, it protects us from an overarching government but after the 9-11 attack The USA Patriot Act of 2001 weakened this law. 3. As citizens of America we are all entitled to our rights of privacy. When something threatens this guaranteed privacy we should take extra precautions, because as the

Introduction to Management CSL & Macquarie Group

Question: Discuss about theIntroduction to Management for CSL Macquarie Group. Answer: Introduction: CSL Group Vision Mission CSL is having strong belief regarding security, quality and also the customers they attend. Its wide research and development, the variety of sustenance facilities shows that we are still assured to all the consumers who rely on our produces. CSL Behring aims to provide people with best probable treatments and amenities (About CSL Behring, 2016). CSL Behring mission is to be a developing Australian communal industry focusing in biological goods aiding both Australian and intercontinental wellbeing. Values The CSL Behring Values fix a ground for operating through the association and aids in deciding in different businesses that forms a part of CSL Behring. The values defined by CSL group in year 2002 are (About CSL Behring, 2016): Emphasis on consumer - We are passionate about meeting the needs of our customers New inventions - We seek better ways of doing things Truthfulness - We are ethical and honest at all times Teamwork - We work together to achieve better results Greater Performance - We strive to be the best at what we do Corporate Responsibility At CSL, Business Responsibility tells us about leading our profession morally and thus making a cause towards the economy, society and environmental health of the societies. They consider that working sensibly is important for the existence of the company (About CSL Behring, 2015). The major areas are: CSL line up its corporate responsibility according to its business aims and make sure that it pairs with exclusive abilities and profits of their shareholders. Finding and making fresh medicines for requirements which are not met and repeatedly cultivating protein-based treatments for patients; They make sure that the treatments are harmless and good in quality by preserving the best criteria while working through the development of the product. Functioning ethically in the market by selling the medicines in a logical way, working as a team to provide people with all information Giving a healthy environment by creating an atmosphere of common faith and honor, thus making people doing their task efficiently and identifying and praising their part. Reducing the effect on environment by managing sensibly the functions and wealth of nature not on the sake of security, quality and availability of the treatments. Stakeholders CSL respect involvement of shareholder as the basis of business responsibility and recognized stakeholders as the workers, patients, financiers, managers, dealers, government, healthcare specialists, plasma donors, corporate associates and the educational and technical society. MacquarieGroup Vision Mission Macquarie has a goal to encourage larger profits and make greater and bearable stakeholder value in accordance with the potential of shareholder for developing good business control. Throughout its history, Macquarie has exhilarated its workers and dealings to see more prospects during its functioning in a solid threat management outline (Welcome back: discover the Macquarie..., 2016). Our aim is to seek prospects for the profit of the people and the stakeholders. They work in a corporate to earn profit in the way best suited to them. Their methodology of working is laid on 3 values: Opportunity- They strive to find chance and comprehend the same for its society, customers, stakeholders and people. Macquarie workers begins with actual information and ability. They emphasize new inventions, cleverness and risk-taking spirit. They upkeep its people to accomplish and flourish. They apprehend opportunity as, honoring new style of thinking and participation of people. Accountability- After opportunity is liability. The people are liable to all the works done, to all the customers, to the society, stakeholders. They are accountable for all our actions, to our clients, our community, our shareholders and each other. They at no cost will negotiate on their morals. The every deed and word of ours is kept as records. They investigate and take risk and proudly take judgments. Integrity- They always behave fairly and equally and respect the promises given by them. Through their actions and morals, they want to get faith of their stakeholders, clients, and people. They have the potential to speak up when something wrong happens Values Macquarie works on six key values and ethics (Welcome back: discover the Macquarie..., 2016). These are Truthfulness Client Assurance Surviving for profits Working in a team Satisfaction of people Teamwork and the bigger ideals. Corporate Social Responsibility The Macquarie Group Foundation funds agenda provides advantage to society in streams of study, health care, health enquiry, surroundings that benefit the entire community in areas of education, arts, health research, health care, welfare and the environment. At present the foundation announced that Macquarie will give a benefit which helps workers to be dedicated to contribute on daily basis to donations or charities by regularly reducing the workers wages (Welcome back: discover the Macquarie..,2016). The Macquarie Group Foundation gives strength and provision to public organizations across the world every year by giving them investment funding, globally each year through financial support, undertaking and membership in services most preferably in regions where Macquarie functions. The working of Macquarie is highly inclined by the actions and happenings of their workers with primary emphasis on the capability construction in the public domain and thus enhancing movement in social and finance areas. Stakeholders The main stakeholders for Macquarie Group are its shareholders, its people and society. Analysis of Statements SMART stands for Specific- should target a specific area Measurable- should be quantifiable easy to measure Assignable- should specific as to who is going to do it Realistic- The results should be achievable with the given resources Time bound- has a timeline attached to it CSLs vision is specific as it targets the safety and quality aspect of its products. Also, it emphasizes on commitment towards creating the best possible therapies and services. Its mission talks about being a growing company which intends to create products which would benefit the health care industry. Macquarie is very specific about its vision as it talks about promoting profitability and delivering value to its shareholders. It also releases very clear corporate governance guidelines every year which are strictly to be followed (Cothran Clark, 2015). Measurability- There isnt any criteria of measurability in the vision of CSL. It commits on providing best possible therapies and services. However, there isnt any metric defined as to how best possible product will be measured or assessed against the other products/ services available in the market. Similarly, its mission does not indicate as to how it will assess whether its products are benefitting the health care segment or not (Annual Report, 1999). Macquarie talks about delivering profitability and value to its shareholders which are clearly measurable metrics. Assignable- CSL assigns the responsibility of its research and development team to create the best therapies and services which are supreme in quality and are safe for consumers to use. Macquarie on the other hand assigns the responsibility to its staff to pursue and grab as many opportunities as possible with calculated risks. It also clearly defines what it means by the term opportunity, for its people. Realistic- CSLs vision focuses on the safety and quality of the products. However, providing the best possible products seems to be a little unrealistic as it is not possible to measure if its products are the best in the market. Delivering profitability and value for its shareholders and sound corporate governance procedures are realistic parameters that Macquarie aims to focus on and deliver in the future. Time bound- CSL does not assign any timeline to its mission and vision. In a similar way, Macquaries statement also does not indicate any timeline attached to it. Believable and Add Value CSL Behring is saying that they will provide the best possible products but it is not possible to define what are the best possible products available or cant be designed by any pharmaceutical company. So, it is not believable. They say that they are serving the people and the society. This is believable and looking at many past records of the company. As US FDA (Food And Drug Administration) has also approved it in providing treatments to diseases like A, providing Pediatric Treatment for Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) and thus serving the society (U.S. FDA Approves CSL Behring's Berinert.., 2016). So this is believable. Macquarie aims at providing value to shareholders and aims at making profits. This is believable. Their method of working is also believable. CSL group adds value to the needs of the people and the society by developing new inventions and laying more emphasis on demands of affected people. Macquarie adds value for its workers as according to an investment bank UBS, it pays its worker very good salaries (Letts, 2015). It is also valuable for its shareholders as it thinks of their profits and give them maximum returns. Conclusion Macquarie group has SMART goals in comparison to CSL group. It aims to measure profitability and value provided to shareholder in comparison to the global vision of CSL of providing best quality products to its consumers. Similarly, the vision of Macquarie group is realistic and achievable in comparison to the CSL group. List of References Macquarie Group Limited, 2016. Welcome back: discover the Macquarie difference. [online] Available at: https://www.macquarie.com/au/corporate [Accessed 31 March 2016]. CSL Behring, 2016. CSL Behring: Biotherapies for life. [online] Available at: https://www.cslbehring.com/homepage [Accessed 2016]. Clark, L. J., Wysocki, A., Cothran, H., 2015. Developing SMART goals for your organization. UF/IFAS Extension. Letts, S., 2015. Macquarie Group pays its staff too much, says rival investment bank UBS. ABC News. Company Overview ofCSL Behring LLC, 2016. Bloomberg. CSL Limited, 1999. Annual Report 1998-1999. Melbourne:CSL Limited.

To Kill A Mockinbird From Novel to Motion Picture Essay Example For Students

To Kill A Mockinbird: From Novel to Motion Picture Essay Creating a motion picture from a novel and conveying the authors intended message is a difficult task. Some film makers gracefully meet the challenge, while others fail, warping the original meaning of the novel in order to appeal to he general movie going population. Harper Lees To Kill A Mockingbird novel to movie transition is a mid-ground between the two extremes. Lees theme of tolerance is neither completely destroyed nor completely expressed. The absence of characters Dolphus Raymond and Link Deas, along with the change in Dills personality in the movie contributes to the deterioration of Lees original theme of tolerance. We will write a custom essay on To Kill A Mockinbird: From Novel to Motion Picture specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Dolphus Raymond is a white man who lives among the black community and is with a white woman. The Negroes sat quietly in the sun, dining on sardines, crackers, and the more vivid flavors or Nehi Cola. Mr. Dolphus Raymond sat with them. (163) Mr Raymonds ability to look past the racial prejudices of the time and live with the black community displays his personal integrity and helps to convey the theme of racial tolerance, showing that a white man can live peacefully alongside Negroes. Link Deas is a plantation owner who treats his black employees kindly. For example, when Bob Ewell gave Mrs. Robinson trouble when she passed by his house on the way to work, Link Deas threatened to take Mr. Ewell to court if he ever did it again. Mr. Deas also stood up for Tom in the courtroom. Link Deass show of tolerance and kindness towards blacks is essential to Harper Lees theme of tolerance and his absence takes away from the theme. In the novel Dill is portrayed as an innocent and caring person, while in the movie he doesnt have any personality at all. Dills sympathetic nature in the novel helps to portray Lees theme of tolerance by showing that people are born with compassion and only change as a result of their environment. The Dill in the motion picture is only a paper cutout of the real Dill. Dills missing personality greatly takes away from Harper Lees theme of tolerance. In the change from novel to motion picture of To Kill A Mockingbird, Harper Lees theme of racial tolerance is deteriorated. The absence of characters Dolphus Raymond and Link Deas, along with the change in Dills personality in the motion picture water down the authors original message.